Category Archives: Adoption

I Tried to Communicate. She Got Hurt. Things Closed Down.

Last week’s Dear Lavvie question was from an adoptive mom wanting to open herself up for her daughter’s sake in spite of past hurts. This week we have a birth family member who wonders how to pry open a relationship with the adoptive family in light of a perceived hurt.

open adoption advice

Dear Lavvie: I am an adoptive mother and have recently become part of a birth family. My niece and three nephews have been living with a foster family who are now in the process of adopting them. We have been very supportive of the adoption as their birth parents are not in a place to take care of the children.

Here is the problem. On the day of relinquishment the foster mom said on Facebook that “one family’s loss is another family’s gain.”  I reached out to her and told her that her statement was very hurtful.  Her response was to claim we are not supportive and in response they are pushing out my entire family, especially my mom and myself. How do I facilitate openness with the adoptive family when they seem very resistant? ~~ Anna

~~~

Brooke RandolphOpen Adoption Advice

Guest advising today is Brooke Randolph, LMHC. Brooke is a parent, therapist, and adoption professional with 25 years of experience working with children, families, and individuals.

Brooke’s response: This isn’t an easy situation, Anna. There are so many factors to consider.

Please understand that in what I’m about to say, I am not blaming you or placing fault for what you said or how you said it. I ask you to trust that the fix — what is within your power to do — may lie in you being willing to offer an apology anyway. Keep reading.

In expressing your hurt and asking for the foster mom to relate to you differently, you unintentionally hurt the relationship with her. She therefore incorrectly perceives you as being unsupportive of the adoption moving forward.

While the advice to offer an apology may surprise or even appall you, I see it as the most direct route to relationship repair. As I’ve stated before, “An apology is absolutely necessary to repair, restore, and continue a relationship after a hurt… An effective apology can not only restore a relationship, it can help it to grow. An effective apology communicates that the relationship is important and the person’s feelings are important. An ineffective apology or no apology at all can communicate to the other that you do not truly value the relationship.”

In your apology, make sure to use all five components of an effective apology. If you need help coming up with how to integrate some of them, a neutral third party or trusted counselor may be helpful.

If your apology is accepted, great. You can move forward together. But if the apology is not met with the spirit intended (which is a key ingredient but not always a deciding factor, result-wise), you may need to gracefully allow her to choose to hang on to hurt. If this happens you could ask if the adopting family would be comfortable with you sending letters to her children. Go the extra mile and identify the children as hers rather than “your niece and nephews.” I know this may be difficult or even painful, but your ultimate goal is an open relationship for the children more than it is about introducing your wants and needs.

If you try to share information with her about open adoption, you risk appearing to be a know-it-all or holier-than-thou. As parents, we all get it wrong sometimes, but perceived mom-shaming rarely brings about true change and it almost always harms relationships. Because you are further along the journey of adoptive parenting, she may take unsolicited information or advice as belittling her. Is there anyone else who might be an ally for you and the children from whom she might welcome input?

Don’t give up if the apology doesn’t bring healing right away. Do you remember, Anna, how much anxiety you experienced during your adoption process? If the adopting mom is like I was, she probably doesn’t even realize how unsurefooted she is. Time can bring changes and new information and new needs. Remain open, remain positive, remain loving. Avoid negativity, gossip, spite, etc. Remember that your ultimate goal is an open relationship with your niece and nephews for their benefit. They need the opportunity to attach to their adoptive mother. They need less drama in their lives. They need you to have an open heart, ready and waiting to give, and always loving.

Brooke Randolph is a private practice counselor in Indianapolis, Indiana, and was a founding member of MLJ Adoptions, Inc. She is a Young Professionals Advisory Board member for The Villages, Indiana’s largest not-for-profit child and family services agency. Brooke adopted an older child internationally as a single woman, which she considers one of the most difficult and most rewarding things she has ever done. She is a contributing author to the book Adoption Therapy: Perspectives from Clients and Clinicians on Processing and Healing Post-Adoption Issues (2014).

Lori Holden, adoption authorMy 2 cents: Often we want to make the other person change. We don’t actually have that power, though. We have two other powers: we can help that person WANT to change, and we can determine if we need to change something in ourselves.

The former requires that first we be in relationship with the other person. The second requires an honest assessment of our role in the conflict and a pragmatic approach to doing what’s within our power to do.

Brooke’s approach utilizes both of these powers. An apology — “I’m sorry my words hurt you; I didn’t mean to and I respect what you’re doing with these children” — is within Anna’s power to do, AND it has potential to repair the hurt in the relationship.

Anna, I want to acknowledge your own hurt and fear, and your original desire to support these children’s adoptive mom. I’m sorry that your true message — not to split the babies between their two families — got lost in her hurt.

This brings me to one last point.  The trigger for all this hurt was when the adopting mother said, “one family’s loss is another family’s gain.” This is evidence of the too-prevalent and potentially harmful Either/Or mindset. The adopting mom may hold this only because she doesn’t know there is an alternative. Adoptive parents in varying degrees of surefootedness can easily envision and embrace a Both/And heartset once they know that it exists.

Dear Readers, what say you?

See also: The Open-Hearted Way to Open Adoption, aimed to help both adoptive and birth family members navigate contact and openness.

~~~

About this Open Adoption Advice Column

  • Rather than tell people what they should do, instead I say what *I* might do were I in the asker’s position.
  • I may occasionally call on others to help with answers, to tap into group wisdom.
  • I am not trained as a therapist. Please do not rely on words in this space to make your own major or minor decisions.

As always, readers are encouraged to weigh in thoughtfully and respectfully. I ask everyone to remember that this is a teaching endeavor rather than a shaming endeavor, and that we aim to bring light rather than heat. It’s my belief that people do the best they can with what they have to work with, and our goal is to give folks more to work with.

Send in your own question for possible inclusion. Subscribe so you don’t miss anything.

Dear TX Senator Donna Campbell

Let’s talk — adoptive mom to adoptive mom.

I understand having fears about adoption and, by extension, fears about making changes in adoption law. Change can be scary. For decades many states have had laws on the books to protect people from the humiliation of unwed pregnancy or the shame of infertility or the stigma of being born to unmarried parents. In response, we have put up walls to hide the shame and stigma and humiliation.

One of those walls is the practice of closing birth records for one group of people who, due to circumstances of birth, to this day do not enjoy a civil right that all other citizens in your state do. It is time to re-evaluate the existence of this wall, as so many of your Texas bipartisan colleagues in the Senate and House  were eager to do at the close of the legislative session last month.

While I do understand having fears, Dr Campbell, I also think we should periodically re-examine and let go of fears that don’t withstand ongoing scrutiny. Let’s take a look at one of the fears that motivated your stance on Texas House Bill 984. Your office said that you’re “concerned with the broad language of the bill, and felt it violated the privacy of those involved in the adoption.”

When you say privacy I wonder if you are confusing it with secrecy,  which takes simple privacy and wraps it in toxic fear and shame. Privacy is chosen, secrecy is often imposed.

Secrecy exists because shame exists. With openness, by unsealing records and providing equal access for all, we can dissolve the shame and  vanquish the need for secrecy. Regarding the privacy issue, accurate birth records should be kept private from the public but not secret from the parties directly involved.

As you may already realize, the Internet and advances in DNA testing have enabled birth mothers and birth fathers and their now-adult children to find each others’ identities by skirting laws that were constructed in that era of shame and secrecy. Psychotherapist Karen Caffrey, who is an adult adoptee with birth family from Texas, says, “Family genetic secrets are very soon going to be a thing of the past.”

So why not change the laws to keep up with the times?

By the sheer numbers of people — adopted or not — who are searching for their biological kin, we can conclude that there is an innate human need to know one’s origins, no matter the story behind it. How else to explain the popularity of Roots, of Who Do You Think You Are, or of  Ancestry.com, which facilitates folks in enjoying the second-most popular hobby in the country?

I wonder, Senator Campbell, if one of your fears comes from an Either/Or mindset that stems from the way we’ve done adoption during our lifetimes, in which for you to fully claim your daughter, you must negate on some level the existence of her other set of parents. But we don’t have to split our children in this way. We can instead embrace a Both/And heartset in which all are acknowledged and valued, no matter if there is contact or not, no matter if you know the identity of your daughter’s birth father or not.

I hear during your questioning at the hearing of a similar bill in 2013 that you may be fearful that the child might want to “go back for financial reasons.” Quite frankly, I do not understand this. You pressed witnesses quite hard to name a valid impetus for the bill. Might I press you to say what makes you think an adult adoptee would  have money as a prime motivator for searching for her biological roots? In all my years of learning about the many facets of adoption, I have not heard one story or seen any statistics on this being the case.

When STAR (Support Texas Adoptee Rights) and its legislative allies manage to bring this issue to the table again during the 2017 legislative session, please consider the 180-degree turnaround that happened 21 years ago for one one of your Ohio counterparts, Senator Brad Norris, also an adoptive parent.

Of his role in sealing Ohio’s birth records in the 1960s, he later said,

“I did not want any and all members of the general public to have access to my children’s birth records . . . We must be honest in recognizing that the 1964 law was created mostly out of concerns felt by adoptive parents.” [source]

Three decades later, the former OH senator testified in support of a bill to equalize access to birth records for adult adoptees. In his testimony, Mr Norris, adoptive dad to Betsie Norris, Executive Director of Adoption Network Cleveland, explained his change of heart and his chagrin at the wall he’d helped erect.

“In doing what I did on this 1960s legislation, I was unable to see the impact this would have on my adopted children when they became adults . . . I now recognize that closing those birth records to adoptees … was a grave mistake . . . there was not sufficient attention given to what happens when the adoptive child grows up and needs to know his or her genetic medical history or when the adult adoptee develops an undeniable yearning to know what his or her roots are.” [source]

For your own sake, Dr Campbell, please open your mind and your heart to this issue that you have previously been closed tight on. You don’t want to be seen as the last one propping up an oppressive wall, do you?

Sincerely,
Lori, mom via adoption

Three things cannot be hidden:
the sun, the moon, and the truth. ~~ Buddha